A few years ago, I was able to visit Yankee Stadium, before it became the overpriced collection of luxury boxes that it is today. And when there, you have to experience certain things. You go to the back of the park and you meander around the monuments. You get as close to touching the field as possible. And you enjoy a New York hotdog, Kosher if you prefer, in what was one of baseball’s last true sanctuaries. After completing the checklist, I wandered back toward my seat, passing, as it seemed, dozens of gates to various sections of the park. And inside one of the gates, I saw something that I had never seen before, and most likely will never see again. Inside a little tomb-sized corridor around the 3rd baseline, a handful of fully robed monks kneeled in prayer for their beloved pin-stripe crusaders. They adjourned with an “Amen,” and a smattering of high-fives, before pulling their robes back and descending the stairs to their seats.
I tell this story not to romanticize the game that I love – it is romantic enough, I believe. I tell this story to ask, quite seriously, what faith’s role should be in our lives. As I mentioned in my last theologically themed post “Godless,” I have some considerable problems with the tradition of prayer and where it belongs. Let us delve into some more suggestive skepticism.
I have no issue with prayer itself, or the confession of one’s “sins” or faults, and I encourage all of those whose lives are filled with faith to pray to whomever they see fit. My beliefs tend to consider it a lost art. And as I mentioned before, I find it selfish to expect the leader of the universe to concentrate on my problems that admittedly play no part in the global balance. But a priest will tell you otherwise, a rabbi or a minister, and I have no credentials to argue with their opinions of the act. But I do find the role of faith to be contradictory, at best, in the lives of some people who seem to focus soundly on it’s glow.
For example, Terry Schiavo, who I hope you remember from the news, was a case of a vegetated woman and a man who felt desire to move on with his life. She could not recover, the doctors deemed it so, and yet the aspect of faith helped to keep her on assisted living equipment for many years after her accident. God would take her when it was her time, or would heal her in a miraculous moment, or so the argument became from right-wing punditry and panelists, and “do-gooders” of the faith. But if this whole woman’s life balanced on the idea of faith, the idea of a hand reaching down to determine her fate, then why did they ever bother to save her in the first place? Why were machines used to keep her alive? Why were meds administered daily? And where, when all is said and done, does faith really lie in matters of health concern, injury, or death?
There are people in the world that don’t believe in medical advancement, and would never dream to use it to save themselves from even the worst possibilities of death. To be honest, I admire them, and their commitment to their faith. Meanwhile, the majority of our society would beg to argue that God gave us these developments as a gift to preserve more human lives. This is, again, a compelling argument. But I further this idea by suggesting that God gave us many developments, including the element of personal choice, and yet some we deem as good ideas, others become bad. The choice to pull Ms. Schiavo’s plug could be seen as a gift from God. This is never the argument. No, such choices will be seen as the outcome of Eve’s failure in the Garden of Eden, the loss of paradise, and the rise of evil in all choices of our lives. And yet again, the fight between logic and faith begins to show its teeth, and most of us remain on the sidelines.
A friend of mine, who is now a tremendously outspoken follower of all things Christ, tried to explain to me the role of facts in comparison to faith. To paraphrase slightly, (my memory is at its worst, it seems,) he told me that sometimes facts have to take a backseat to faith, which is the highest truth of them all. At the time I took it as a quite profound statement, but he scurried out the door before I realized how ridiculous it really was. I can believe the sky is red – shout it from every single mountain – but the fact remains that on the finest days of spring and fall alike, the sky will always be its most distinct shade of baby blue. And where education is encouraging us to answer all of the unanswered, I find it almost insulting that religion remains consistent in their solution: If you don’t know the answer…God did it.
For all the cracks that science is trying to figure out, our religious institutions have already filled them with their own thick compound of theological concrete: God. And how does this challenge us as intelligent beings to understand how the world works? It doesn’t. And in matters of evolution, which still has its detractors, why is it so hard to say, “This is a product of God. So the Bible was a metaphor, full of wonderful parables for life, but the facts are here and solid, and evolution is for real. But evolution came from somewhere. And I’ll believe it came from God.” This is rarely a theory from anyone, from either side of the debate, and it seems like a logical one to me. But instead, God becomes a product in too many cases, where he should be at his most important role: a beginning. But again, it’s all my theory, and you’re more than willing to shoot it down.
And here we find ourselves overwhelmed with the miracles of faith. People can cite faith as the reason their father made it out of the car wreck alive, or in even more trivial instances, the reason why they received an A on the last exam. In the minds of some, it’s never a matter of medicine, practice, study, coincidence, hard work, or dare I say, luck. It’s a miracle, or it’s due to their prayers, or the faith that they have spread through their lives. Another friend of mine made a beautiful point about prayer and it’s overall benefit: You may be praying to nothing or no one, but the energy you’re building can’t be a bad thing. It’s another idea to shuffle into the “I don’t know” box, but it’s also worth a thought.
A few weeks ago, I made a comment somewhere on the world wide web that suggested that atheistic athletes don’t exist. I was happy, no, ECSTATIC, to have someone correct me with a little factoid that I had previously not known: Lance Armstrong, considered by many to be the world’s finest athlete and the pinnacle of strength, determination, and concentration, has rejected the idea of faith. It was one tiny point in my favor when I think about the hundreds of athletes that praise God for answering their prayers in time of achievement, but never mention their disappointment in the holy spirit when they fail. Armstong’s efforts reaffirm my notion that self-reliance is not only an option, but one that you can always be proud to practice. God can be part of all our lives, but we must be willing to work for ourselves if we intend to strike it big.
I don’t like the compliment “Christ-follower.” I’ve heard it used too often lately to showcase the best traits of newfound friends. “He is a great Christ-follower.” This shouldn’t mean anything to the majority of us, really. This is, again, to assume that your beliefs are correct, and the only ones worth mentioning. This also says nothing of the personality of your friend. And far too often I find myself in the middle of God mentioning contests, where the person that relates to Christianity the most is suddenly the best example of the holy way. I know a great many atheists who lack all forms of faith and burden themselves with less moral failures than your average “great Christ-follower.” Does faith now determine your friendship? Are you not allowed to open your mind? And are all other options blasphemous in comparison to your system of beliefs? All for faith?
The Bible’s greatest example of faith lies in the story of Abraham, asked by God to sacrifice his only son, luckily stopped right before the slaughter of Isaac. I bring about my final point with sincerity: people hear voices every day, and I remind you that murders happen every year based on the premise of the voice that told them to do it. Children are drown in bathtubs, spouses are stabbed through the heart, all from the notion of a voice inside their mind. Are these matters of faith? The Son of Sam from NYC claimed that his neighbor’s dog, (later morphed into the devil,) was telling him to kill innocent victims. We think these people are crazy. I don’t argue that they are. But we admire those who hear the word of God, and often accept their words as direct corollaries of divinity. Are schizophrenics lonely prophets? Are men of God lying when they preach? It seems these voices would happen for a reason – is it God? I do not know.
I’ll finalize this lengthy argument, for your sake, and for mine. Is faith enough to be the ship to carry your decisions? One final point, (this time I mean it,) and I’m done: Hitler thought it was. Faith was enough to convince him that the Jews were not fit for life, and he worshipped the same God that most of us do. A Christian God. The Bible’s God. The God that shines for so many every day. He was not a pagan, nor follower of some strained sect, but a God-fearing Christian of prototype: a believer. And I ask you, one more time – is faith the lone consideration for your life?
A small boy served whole on a bed of rice,
After she read this much, Madeleine said, “How could you write such things about me?” and wept in a way I could not bear.
(I won’t lie to you: I’m busy.